-- Andrew Snow -- 04/17/2008
Last night, at Iowa State’s Memorial Union, I had the opportunity to listen to a lecture by the self-proclaimed ‘Skeptical Environmentalist’ Bjorn Lomborg. Lomborg is best known among climate activists (and opponents) as the author of such books as ‘The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming’ - a book that has created a great deal of controversy in the scientific community. A community, it’s worth noting, that Lomborg isn’t a member of - he’s not actually a scientist. The controversy has included the following, as noted by the New York Times:
The Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty, after a six-month review following several complaints filed by scientists, issued a 17-page report yesterday concluding that the book displayed ‘systematic one-sidedness’. ‘’Objectively speaking,’’ the committees found, ‘’the publication of the work under consideration is deemed to fall within the concept of scientific dishonesty,’’ as defined by Danish rules for scientific integrity.
Overall, that’s the impression that I took away from yesterday’s lecture, too - that the basic facts in his arguments that are true, but are used poorly enough to be essentially dishonest. It’s not an accurate reflection of what’s going on with the environmental/climate change community to use the 1997 Kyoto Protocol as the basis for all your arguments about what it means to fight global warming. Nor is it accurate to assume that renewable energy sources such as solar are always going to be expensive, that wind isn’t getting more efficient, and that coal and oil are going to remain plentiful and cheap.
Apparently, however, there is one thing that’s changing very rapidly, and becoming more accurate with every new evolution - the ‘skeptical’ arguments about global warming. "It’s not happening" becomes "It’s not manmade", which is now morphing into "It’s real, it’s manmade, so what? We’ve got other things to worry about". Hopefully, the next step will be for them to become a little more skeptical about the wisdom of doing nothing.
My favorite clip from the lecture can be found here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=L2EuvMCga0U
Polar bear protected but habitat still in danger
Tell the Candidates to Make Global Warming a Priority
by Andrew Snow
Well, it's finally spring. No, really, I'm pretty sure spring is going to stay this time. So, now that you've got the option to get outside, what are you going to do? One good place to start is Bike to Work Week (http://www.bikeiowa.com), which is a weeklong series of events highlighting the benefits of riding a bike rather than driving your car. Simple solutions such as bike transportation help put us on a path to reducing global warming pollution - not to mention the path to better health and happier lives. I'll be biking into work this week, and I hope you'll join me in taking this small step.
While I'm talking about transportation... Read More
by Andrew Snow
Today is the last day of ‘Earth Month’ - you know, the month that has Earth Day. It’s nice to see the expansion of the theme from day, to week, to month. Of course, it’s up to each of us to make sure that the values of a sustainable world and brighter future are considered all year - but we’ve certainly got a good start. One thing I found encouraging this month: well over 300 Iowa Global Warming Campaign supporters attended at least one event statewide - and we’ve got more coming up, check our calendar to find an event near you.
Another thing I’m excited about is the Amtrak study released this month clearly demonstrating the feasibility and demand for rail service from Chicago to Iowa City through the Quad Cities...
Read More