The Threat
"We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted by the fierce urgency of now." --Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
The debate is over. Global warming is already occurring and without significant action to reduce carbon emissions within the next decade, scientists predict that the consequences could be severe and potentially irreversible. Our dependence on fossil fuels is transforming the planet. The Earth has already warmed and there is now more carbon pollution in the atmosphere than at any point in 650,000 years. If we do nothing, the Earth could warm by several degrees more.
A 2 degree increase would equal the warmest temperatures in 500,000 years. At that point in time, sea levels were 16 feet higher. Three million years ago, the Earth's temperature was 5 degrees warmer and sea levels were 80 feet higher.
The Consequences
Although life will survive significant increases in temperature, global warming will leave us with a vastly different planet than the one we inherited. The potential consequences of catastrophic global warming include:
Watch a video from Tom Brokaw's Special "Global Warming: What You Need to Know" on the impacts that are already occurring to the world's glaciers.
To avoid leaving our children a harsh future, we need to significantly reduce carbon pollution within the next 50 years. There is still time, but we must start now.
"How long have we got? We have to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide within a decade...we don't have much time left."--Dr. James Hansen, Director of NASA Goddard Institute
The Opportunity
For the past hundred years, the U.S. has relied on coal and oil to power our economy. That dependence is now a threat to our future. It is time to usher in a new era of energy production and use--one that relies heavily on clean, safe, alternative energy. Solving global warming will reduce our dependence on oil, strengthen our economy, and protect our planet. But it will not be easy.
Transforming our energy sector away from fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, toward new clean technologies will require a serious commitment. Like all great challenges, it will require bold leadership and a clear vision.
The greatest resource at our disposal is American ingenuity, which political leaders have refused to tap. The federal government continues to ignore existing solutions, like increasing fuel efficiency in our cars or significantly boosting production from renewable energy, which can help move us in the right direction. Even worse, by placing no limit on carbon pollution, we are deepening our dependence on fossil fuels, as investors continue to lack a clear market signal to shift investment to new energy technologies.
By placing a mandatory limit on carbon pollution, we can send a clear signal that we are committed to ending our dependence on fossil fuels.
For details on solutions to global warming, check out "The Tipping Point" on NRDC's website.
Three years is a long ways away!!
Tell the Candidates to Make Global Warming a Priority
by Andrew Snow
Today is the last day of ‘Earth Month’ - you know, the month that has Earth Day. It’s nice to see the expansion of the theme from day, to week, to month. Of course, it’s up to each of us to make sure that the values of a sustainable world and brighter future are considered all year - but we’ve certainly got a good start. One thing I found encouraging this month: well over 300 Iowa Global Warming Campaign supporters attended at least one event statewide - and we’ve got more coming up, check our calendar to find an event near you.
Another thing I’m excited about is the Amtrak study released this month clearly demonstrating the feasibility and demand for rail service from Chicago to Iowa City through the Quad Cities...
Read More
by Andrew Snow
Last night, at Iowa State's Memorial Union, I had the opportunity to listen to a lecture by the self-proclaimed 'skeptical environmentalist' Bjorn Lomborg. Lomborg is best known among climate activists (and opponents) as the author of such books as 'The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming' - a book that has created a great deal of controversy in the scientific community. A community, it's worth noting, that Lomborg isn't a member of - he's not actually a scientist. The controversy has included the following, as noted by the New York Times:
Read More